New ways of circumvention identified
This is the main outcome of the EU-funded project “ANTICSS – Anti-Circumvention of Standards for better market Surveillance”. A research team involving 19 organisations from eight EU Member States spent three-and-a-half years analysing the circumvention of mandatory requirements of the European regulations and harmonized standards for ecodesign and energy labelling.
Four laboratories in Germany, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands tested a total of 24 specifically selected product models; six of them showed a circumvention or borderline to circumvention behaviour. If manufacturers were to exploit these breaches very broadly, around 200,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalents more would escape into the atmosphere each year than officially declared. Over the total life of the appliances this would amount to around 2.4 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents.
Two key ways of closing loopholes
“The European Union should therefore close the existing breaches in the legislation and standards as quickly as possible,” urges project manager Kathrin Graulich of the Oeko-Institut.The research team recommends doing this in two ways. Firstly, the EU should expand the definition of circumvention. At present the term covers only integrated software that recognises when an appliance is being tested and automatically optimises its configuration resulting in a more favourable measured performance. Other circumvention possibilities to be prohibited include the misuse of manufacturers’ instructions, in other words the formulation of specific instructions for laboratories that lead to better results in the testing situation, as well as possible pre-setting or operational modes and functions of products that reduce the energy consumption in the test situation but are rarely or even only theoretically applicable to real life.
Secondly, market surveillance authorities need a legal basis for the use of the deviating measure-ment procedure to detect the presence of circumvention in the tested products. To this end the ANTICSS research team has developed modified tests in which the manipulable parameters or detectable test conditions are varied slightly. If the results differ significantly from the results achieved following the harmonised standard conditions, the suspicion that the appliance has been optimised especially for the conformity verification test is reinforced.
Further research and action are needed regarding exactly how these modified tests should be used to support the compliance to legislation and integrated in standards in future.
Loss of trust is the biggest risk
The primary goal is to close loopholes and to make circumvention more difficult from the outset to prevent market distortions and misinformation on the environmental impact of products. “It’s not just about the loss of expected energy savings: far greater damage would be caused by the loss of consumers’ trust in the highly successful European legislation on ecodesign and energy labelling,” fears Kathrin Graulich and the entire ANTICSS team.
The study “ANTICSS Final report: Closing all roads to circumvention” by the Oeko-Institut and the ANTICSS project consortium is available at:
ANTICSS in brief
The topic of manipulated testing results, or “circumvention” was exposed to the highest attention of the public and media, not only for the emission of cars (“dieselgate”) but also with regard to other EU legislation. For this reason, the project “ANTICSS – Anti-Circumvention of Standards for better market Surveillance” has been funded by European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme. Its objectives were to define and assess "circumvention" in relation to EU ecodesign and energy labelling legislation and their harmonised standards.